MANHATTAN FED BANKRUPTCY JUDGE MARTIN GLENN UNDER FIRE FROM TRILLION DOLLAR IVIEWIT INVENTOR ELIOT BERNSTEIN

MANHATTAN FED BANKRUPTCY
Judge Martin Glenn
UNDER FIRE FROM TRILLION DOLLAR
IVIEWIT INVENTOR ELIOT BERNSTEIN
AS RELATED FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER
Christine Anderson
CALLS FOR FEDERAL SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
r
Federal Judge Martin Glenn, Southern District of NY is under fire & request for investigation for Title 18 Obstruction of Justice & related charges by Inventor Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies
r
"September 22, 2009 -- Federal Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn ( Glenn ) of the Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court ( SDNYBK ) Manhattan is under fire & request to be investigated for Title 18 Obstruction of Justice & related charges by Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein ( EIB ) an Inventor of Technologies deemed “priceless” by leading engineers at Real3d Inc ( R3D ) that were stolen & subject of a trillion dollar federal lawsuit.

The requests by EIB come as a legally related Whistleblower Christine Anderson heads to public trial in Fed Court in Manhattan under Judge Shira A.

Scheindlin & recently publicly called for a Fed Special Prosecutor regarding systemic corruption in the operation of the NYS Courts.

EIB is the original inventor & owner of Technologies relating to video compression & scaling deemed priceless by leading engineers at R3D an Orlando, FL based company located on property owned by Lockheed Martin. R3D was owned together by Lockheed, the Intel Corporation & Silicon Graphics, Inc. ( SGI ), while EIB’s technologies were tested & used in the R3D labs.

Other leaders in the graphics industry heralded the technologies as the “Holy Grail” of the digital imaging & video including such industry figures as Hassan Miah formerly of the CAA Intel Labs.

EIB a Claimant & Creditor of the SGI & related companies in the SDNYBK ( cases Jointly Administered under Docket No. 09-11701 ) after the holy grail inventions were stolen & fraudulent patent applications & wrongful actions & other occurred by major law firms & others as the Internet Market was booming in the late ‘90s including law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner. SGI filed a second Ch. 11 bk application on Apr 1, 09 only 6 days after EIB filed a Formal SEC Complaint against the Intel announcing a Trillion Dollar possible accounting fraud, FASB No. 5 violations & more for the infringement of his technologies.

The SEC complaint requested an examination of the sales transactions between Intel, SGI & Lockheed involving R3D & SGI In House General Counsel Elena Ramirez was on express notice of the EIB claims & SEC complaint on March 25, 2009, 6 days before SGI filed for its second Ch. 11 protection just months after coming out of bk & after announcing business articles painting a rosy picture for the company.

On April 1, 2009 when SGI filed again in Ch. 11, the company simultaneously asked to employ the firm Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP ( DPW ) as Special Counsel & Ropes & Gray, LLP ( RG ). Ironically, DPW admitted to simultaneously representing Lockheed & SGI who are 2 of the 3 Equity owners of R3D that was under Signed NDA with the EIB technologies in addition to DPW representing accountants KPMG for SGI who assisted in the financials for the Ch. 11 filing. DPW attorney Kelly admitted in a Declaration to be an Inside Officer & Counsel for SGI & later outside counsel for SGI thru DPW for the critical years at the heart of the EIB thefts 1998-2004 & 2006 on. DPW also admitted to representing companies also under signed NDA for the Iviewit technologies such as CIBC, Credit Suisse & Morgan Stanley.

Shockingly, Glenn deliberately & knowingly ignored multiple oral & written requests by EIB to address professional conflicts of interests caused by the simultaneous representation by DPW including the fact that RG as lawyers apparently are owners of highly technical patents in the video & digital arenas.

EIB had formally noticed Glenn that a case marked legally “related” to his federal RICO & anti-trust & related lawsuit, that of Anderson a Court Inside WHISTLEBLOWER at the First Department DDC heading to public trial in federal court in October on allegations of systemic public office corruption & whitewashing of complaints against attorneys & had discussed the Iviewit technologies at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ( First Dept ) & also that Harry I. Moatz, Director of the OED of the United States Patent & Trademark Office ( USPTO ) had directed EIB to file Fraud charges against his former lawyers & law firms for FRAUD UPON THE USPTO, Eliot Bernstein, his companies & shareholders.

EIB had filed professional complaints at the First Dept against attorneys at Proskauer, including Kenneth Rubenstein who was & is intimately involved as Counsel for the MPEGLA MPEG Patent Pool while simultaneously acting as Iviewit PATENT COUNSEL creating a massive conflict of interest as MPEGLA is now one of the largest alleged infringers of the stolen technologies. Yet all the complaints had been whitewashed which is part of the legal relation to the Anderson case where Anderson & others trying to come forward as Whistleblowers have been subject to physical assault, harassment & intimidation leading Anderson to publicly call for a Federal Special Prosecutor due to corruption in the NY Courts.

Judge Glenn advised formally by EIB in writing of ongoing investigations & actions in the Iviewit saga including actions by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine of the Department of Justice ( DOJ ), the OPR of the FBI, & that US SDNY Judge Scheindlin had referred EIB & other related cases to seek intervention of the US Attorney and/or NY Attorney General all ignored by Glenn.
The law firm DPW also under scrutiny for recruiting back to the firm former SEC head of Enforcement Linda Chatman Thomsen in April 2009 shortly after EIB filed the SEC Complaint against Intel & after Thomsen was ousted at the SEC for failures involving the $65 Billion Madoff scandal. EIB also noted this fact to Glenn, which now placed DPW close to both the center of the EIB Trillion dollar fraud inquiry & the $65 billion Madoff fraud. Proskauer is also at the heart of the EIB claims & likewise currently under fire as a result of Proskauer & Proskauer Partner Thomas V. Sjoblom’s involvement in the $8 Billion Ponzi involving Sir Robert Allen Stanford & Stanford Financial Group.

EIB has recently filed papers with Glenn seeking mandatory disqualification & investigation of Glenn under Title 18 & other laws as a result of Glenn’s intentional failures to address conflicts as required by law allowing the DPW firm to form a wall of conflict & permitting the judicial office to be used as part of the machinery for RICO & related violations of due process. Amazingly, despite multiple requests & filings by EIB, Glenn recently issued an order not even discussing or mentioning such monumental conflicts of interest nor involvement of multiple federal offices in the EIB matters. EIB’s request forwarded to various oversight & related bodies including the Judicial Council, the SDNY US Attorney, the DOJ & NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

According to Scheindlin, the legally related case of Anderson has validly stated claims for 1st Amendment violations for being terminated from her position of Staff Attorney at the First Dept after 6 years after speaking out about the systemic corruption & whitewashing of complaints against connected law firms.

Attorney Raymond Joao of Yonkers who previously worked at Meltzer Lippe also named Defendant in the EIB Trillion dollar fed lawsuit as Joao allegedly put 90 plus patents into his name while retained by Iviewit companies & relating to inventions he was to patent for Bernstein. Joao went on to Marc Dreier’s firms where Marc S. Dreier has recently plead guilty in fed court to multiple felonies re a $400 million plus Ponzi.

EIB’s case is currently on appeal at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals where presently a motion is pending to address the multiple layers of conflict in the case according to law. Hundreds of companies under signed NDA with the Iviewit technologies including Fortune 1000 companies & major players like Verizon, Comcast, JP Morgan, AOL – Time Warner, Sony Digital Pictures, Warner Brothers, Kodak, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Telekom, CIBC & more. Action in another case involving lawsuits over IPOs with Internet companies going back to the year 2000 also pending with Scheindlin.

EIB has formally petitioned for involvement of the White House, President Barack Obama, US AG Eric Holder, the US House & Senate Judiciary Committees, Senator Feinstein & others as the Iviewit Technologies are used across all Internet & Cable T.V. providers hosting video, on the Hubble Space Telescope, for a mass of defense applications, & in content creation for both hardware & software involving digital imaging & video scaling & compression, on medical imaging devices & more.

Related links including Anderson’s public call for
a Fed Special Prosecutor for the NY Courts below

Whistleblower Anderson calls for Special Prosecutor

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/09/ny-state-court-insider-calls-for.html
r
NY Ethics Scandal tied to International Espionage & Satellite Communications Intercepts
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2008/04/ny-ethics-scandal-tied-to-international.html

r
Pictorial evidence of Car Bombing of EIB family car while Inventor & wife prepared US Supreme Court documents during Bush years
http://www.iviewit.tv

r
Inventor EIB petitions the White House, President Obama & US AG Eric Holder
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
r
R3D - Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real3D
e
Bernard Madoff SEC’s Revolving Door & Linda Chatman Thomsen returning to Davis Polk Wardell Apr 13, 09 after EIB files Emergency Motion in SGI BK after SEC complaint against Intel, R3D, Mar 25, 09
http://www.oid-ido.org/imprimer.php3?id_article=1030
w
EIB SEC Complaint Intel, SGI, Lockheed & R3D
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf r
Proskauer and Stanford
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/27/the-stanford-affair-another-bad-day-for-proskauers-tom-sjoblom
r
r